Thickest battleship armor
http://chuckhawks.com/armor_schemes.htm WebThis 41-inch-thick (1,000 mm) layer of protection weighed 1,100 pounds per square foot. 24 inches of armour was considered almost completely proof against any contemporary gun …
Thickest battleship armor
Did you know?
Web4 Oct 2024 · With the British Pioneered doctrine, turtleback armor gets you increasing hull armor from bow or stern to amidships where the armor is at its thickest, however since it is with the design philosophies of World War I where engagement distances were much closer, Turtleback has an Achilles heel – This is that the hull while strong has a weakness to … WebHow thick is a battleship deck? The main armored deck was 120 mm (4.7 in) and 100 mm (3.9 in) thick, respectively, though on the outboard sloped sections, thickness was increased to augment the protection over the ships' vitals. Over the magazines, the sloped armor was 150 mm (5.9 in) thick; over the machinery spaces it was 120 mm thick.
Web29 Apr 2024 · Maximum Battleship III – also known as the Tillman III design – weighed 63,000 tons. It had the armor of the second design and the guns of the second design. It could even move at an absurd 30 knots, which is almost as fast as an Iowa- class ship and an insane speed for a ship of that size in 1916. This is a weight equal to the largest ... WebIt also helps that Battleships have some of the thickest armor platings of any other warships in-game. Warships with relatively small-caliber guns such as those found in Destroyer and Cruiser-class warships won’t have enough juice to …
Missiles can be highly accurate and penetrate even the thickest of armor, and thus warships now focus more on anti-missile technology instead of armor. However, most modern warships retain 25 to 50 mm (0.98 to 1.97 in) of partial armor to protect missiles and aircraft from splinters and light weapons fire. See more Naval armor refers to the various protections schemes employed by warships, and is distinguished from other kinds of armour. Naval sailing ships have had protection from weaponry since at least ancient times, … See more Pre-industrial Ship armour is to be distinguished from the practice of hull sheathing for preservational reasons, namely the protection against … See more Iron armour Iron armour was a type of armour used on warships and, to a limited degree, fortifications. The use of iron gave rise to the term See more Belt armour Belt armour is the main side armor on a warship. Armoured citadel An See more Footnotes References 1. ^ D.J. Blackman: "Further Early Evidence of Hull Sheathing", … See more WebI literally beat the crap out of this Nagato class BB and it would not sink!!! After a 2+ hour battle I was highly pissed off and frustrated. I had 4 other ships sitting around me pelting it with all we had. It was dead in the water and completely out of ammo and just wouldn't go down. I ended the battle and it comes up as CRITICAL! Not even a damned SCUTTLED. …
WebThe propulsion plant, communications systems, weapons, ammunition stores, and command and control of the ship were located in a single area within and beneath the …
Web3 Oct 2024 · However, the medieval level of city walls would be of no use in the face of this massive bombardment from the main guns of the battleship. The 31-centimeter shells that penetrate even the thickest battleship armor can shatter any building when hit, while the army’s field artillery shells rain down steel in shrapnel. “Fu, funyaa! clog\u0027s p6Web9 Mar 2006 · The reason that ships have little armour nowdays is because ships have become more expencive to build and fill with electronic equipment, gone are the days of 8 inch thick steel to stop 14 inch shell's, today we fire a volly of missiles so in comparison firing a 14 inch shell would be like taking a pea shooter to a cannon. tartu zoloogiamuuseumWeb25 Oct 2014 · A battleship loaded down with the biggest guns and thickest armor would waddle from place to place. It would make itself an easy target for nimbler opponents or let them run away. clog\u0027s paWebThe advent of much more efficient armor-piercing explosive projectiles, moreover, meant that even the thickest battleship armor was easily perforated at existing battle ranges. And finally, without a substantial superiority in speed, which existing British battleships did not possess over their foreign counterparts, a British fleet was ... tartu ülikool it tugiWeb8 Mar 2016 · It's not the abandonment of armor but the thickness. A Modern all steel destroyer with armor that thick would weigh 12,000-15,000 tons. And even if they did have armor the rise of modern anti ship missiles means even a battleship can be blown to bits. Armor has gave way to countermeasures; intercept/destroy the assaulter before it hits the … clog\u0027s ouWebAs an example, the SOUTH DAKOTA Class battleship ALABAMA had solid 19" Class "B" armor turret faces, while the others had 18-19.5" (roughly) turret faces, in some cases made up of a thin back plate laminated (bolted flush with no gap anywhere) to a thick front plate. The result was slightly weaker than a solid plate, but in this design not by much. tartu ülikool akadeemiline kalenderWeb9 Feb 2016 · In 1876, the warship with the thickest armor ever was launched. Laid down in 1874 and commissioned in 1881, HMS Inflexible carried up to 1042mm (42") of armor, 610mm (24") of iron backed by 432mm (17") of teak. clog\u0027s o